Market Loss Assistance Program in Rutland County, Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 204
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Rutland County, Vermont totaled $1,677,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Douglas White | Danby, VT 05739 | $11,673 |
62 | Shaun L Young | Tinmouth, VT 05773 | $11,514 |
63 | Brandana Farm | Randolph, VT 05060 | $11,312 |
64 | Edward J Pomainville III | Denver, CO 80246 | $11,306 |
65 | Homer & Cecil Brown | Pawlet, VT 05761 | $11,178 |
66 | Ralph & Anne Lewis | Middletown Springs, VT 05757 | $11,048 |
67 | Albert Scribner | Poultney, VT 05764 | $10,188 |
68 | Alfred Wiederhold | Benson, VT 05743 | $10,140 |
69 | Westerly View Farm Inc | Poultney, VT 05764 | $9,733 |
70 | Marcus Fish Jr | Tinmouth, VT 05773 | $9,721 |
71 | Fern Hill Farm, Ltd. | Wallingford, VT 05773 | $9,696 |
72 | Cleon A Kingsley Estate | Florence, VT 05744 | $9,359 |
73 | Stephen F Pelletier | Castleton, VT 05735 | $9,319 |
74 | Everett Hansen | Poultney, VT 05764 | $9,104 |
75 | Robert E Harris | Castleton, VT 05735 | $9,014 |
76 | Gerald E Colvin | Wallingford, VT 05773 | $8,808 |
77 | Brian Rivers | Brandon, VT 05733 | $8,670 |
78 | Bromley Farm Inc | Danby, VT 05739 | $8,620 |
79 | Ronald L Wetherby | Fair Haven, VT 05743 | $8,615 |
80 | Robert E Stannard | Fair Haven, VT 05743 | $8,473 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”