Total Commodity Programs in Rutland County, Vermont, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 85
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Rutland County, Vermont totaled $1,250,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | William B Hanfield Sr | Brandon, VT 05733 | $21,271 |
22 | Harold F Allen | Castleton, VT 05735 | $21,231 |
23 | Chambers Farm LLC | North Clarendon, VT 05759 | $19,764 |
24 | Christopher Lee Forgues | Bomoseen, VT 05732 | $19,444 |
25 | Frank J Grabowski | Castleton, VT 05735 | $18,473 |
26 | Theodore Grembowicz | North Clarendon, VT 05759 | $17,579 |
27 | William L Harris | Poultney, VT 05764 | $15,537 |
28 | Bromley Farm Inc | Danby, VT 05739 | $14,187 |
29 | Gilman Dairy Farm | North Clarendon, VT 05759 | $11,477 |
30 | Pond Hill Ranch | Castleton, VT 05735 | $5,353 |
31 | David H Mills Jr | Brandon, VT 05733 | $4,865 |
32 | Carl Rasmussen | Pittsford, VT 05763 | $3,848 |
33 | Gerald A Hathaway | Benson, VT 05743 | $3,440 |
34 | Lawes Agricultural Service Inc | Brandon, VT 05733 | $2,345 |
35 | Paul J Stewart | Cuttingsville, VT 05738 | $2,333 |
36 | Charron Farms Inc | West Haven, VT 05743 | $2,034 |
37 | Fern Hill Farm, Ltd. | Wallingford, VT 05773 | $2,027 |
38 | Leon R & Alane Clark Jr | Pawlet, VT 05761 | $1,958 |
39 | Roblee Farm Inc | Pawlet, VT 05761 | $1,816 |
40 | Michael Pettis | West Haven, VT 05743 | $1,750 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”