Farm Subsidy information
Washington County, Vermont
Total Subsidies in Washington County, Vermont, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 68
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Washington County, Vermont totaled $286,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Richard Hourihan - Smith Farm | Cabot, VT 05647 | $53,232 |
2 | The Mcknight Farm | East Montpelier, VT 05651 | $43,882 |
3 | Hoolie Flats LLC | East Calais, VT 05650 | $29,207 |
4 | Jennifer Churchill | Cabot, VT 05647 | $24,895 |
5 | Elwin Neill Jr | Waitsfield, VT 05673 | $11,640 |
6 | Fairmont LLC | E Montpelier, VT 05651 | $10,842 |
7 | Defreest Farms | Warren, VT 05674 | $10,452 |
8 | Matthew A Lindstrom | West Danville, VT 05873 | $10,274 |
9 | Burtt's Apple Orchard LLC | Cabot, VT 05647 | $8,217 |
10 | Tamarack Hollow Farm, LLC | Barre, VT 05641 | $7,354 |
11 | , | $6,281 | |
12 | Neddo Farm | Barre, VT 05641 | $5,252 |
13 | Molly Brook Farm LLC | West Danville, VT 05873 | $5,186 |
14 | Brickey Brothers Valley View Farm Llp | Plainfield, VT 05667 | $4,567 |
15 | Frank Johnson | Barre, VT 05641 | $3,849 |
16 | Joseph A Turner | Waitsfield, VT 05673 | $3,813 |
17 | R W Bothfeld Farm LLC | Cabot, VT 05647 | $3,545 |
18 | Mark Davis | Waterbury, VT 05676 | $1,840 |
19 | Martin Churchill | Cabot, VT 05647 | $1,333 |
20 | Good Heart Farmstead L3c | Worcester, VT 05682 | $1,160 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>