Farm Subsidy information
Washington County, Vermont
Total Subsidies in Washington County, Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 364
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Washington County, Vermont totaled $12,260,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Fieldstone Organic Farm LLC | Cabot, VT 05647 | $56,920 |
42 | Merrill Legare | Groton, VT 05046 | $53,502 |
43 | Joseph A Turner | Waitsfield, VT 05673 | $53,289 |
44 | Sharney Byre Farm | Barre, VT 05641 | $52,881 |
45 | J Lowell Logging LLC | Woodbury, VT 05681 | $52,875 |
46 | Woodard's Farm | Waterbury Center, VT 05677 | $50,798 |
47 | Dog River Farm | Berlin, VT 05602 | $46,560 |
48 | Seth B Gardner | East Montpelier, VT 05651 | $44,999 |
49 | Morse Farm | Barre, VT 05641 | $43,236 |
50 | David & Benjamin Renninger | Benson, VT 05743 | $42,444 |
51 | Hoolie Flats LLC | East Calais, VT 05650 | $42,022 |
52 | Burtt's Apple Orchard LLC | Cabot, VT 05647 | $40,586 |
53 | Tamarack Hollow Farm, LLC | Barre, VT 05641 | $40,030 |
54 | Farm Service Agency/commodity Cre | Springfield, OH 45502 | $39,373 |
55 | Stephen Bothfeld | Cabot, VT 05647 | $38,285 |
56 | Triple N Farm | Barre, VT 05641 | $37,977 |
57 | Robert Langlois | Randolph, VT 05060 | $36,670 |
58 | Stanley R Scribner | Montpelier, VT 05602 | $34,512 |
59 | Sheila Morse | East Calais, VT 05650 | $32,991 |
60 | Maynard Farm | Moretown, VT 05660 | $32,983 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”