Total Disaster Programs in Windsor County, Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 196
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Windsor County, Vermont totaled $1,551,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Duane Harrington | North Pomfret, VT 05053 | $1,969 |
102 | Leo Ladouceur | Barnard, VT 05031 | $1,935 |
103 | John M Leavitt | South Royalton, VT 05068 | $1,926 |
104 | Clarence & Judith Sanders | Bethel, VT 05032 | $1,868 |
105 | Ray Moore | Springfield, VT 05156 | $1,861 |
106 | Linda Moore | Springfield, VT 05156 | $1,861 |
107 | Clayton C Carpenter III | Bethel, VT 05032 | $1,855 |
108 | Harvey Hastings | West Windsor, VT 05089 | $1,836 |
109 | Stevens Fair View Farm Partnershi | Springfield, VT 05156 | $1,787 |
110 | Scott Hull | Reading, VT 05062 | $1,768 |
111 | Karen Hull | Reading, VT 05062 | $1,768 |
112 | Bradford Gorham | Chester, VT 05143 | $1,737 |
113 | David H Guest | Norwich, VT 05055 | $1,728 |
114 | Woodstock Foundation Inc | Woodstock, VT 05091 | $1,701 |
115 | Maverick Farm | Sharon, VT 05065 | $1,598 |
116 | Star Hill Dairy | South Woodstock, VT 05071 | $1,580 |
117 | Loretta Earle | Bridgewater Corners, VT 05035 | $1,563 |
118 | James Kinnarney | South Royalton, VT 05068 | $1,553 |
119 | Dave Frary | South Royalton, VT 05068 | $1,468 |
120 | Janice H Luce | White River Junction, VT 05001 | $1,427 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”