Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Virginia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 2,220
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Virginia totaled $13,419,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Frederick Brent Felts | Boykins, VA 23827 | $35,317 |
62 | C S Cunningham Jr | Mouth Of Wilson, VA 24363 | $35,000 |
63 | W S Meek | Sugar Grove, VA 24375 | $34,787 |
64 | Babb Farms Inc | Windsor, VA 23487 | $33,559 |
65 | Dennis Calvin Jones | Tazewell, VA 24651 | $33,457 |
66 | Old Hickory Farms Inc | Stony Creek, VA 23882 | $33,395 |
67 | Raymond W Campbell | Penhook, VA 24137 | $32,570 |
68 | T Coleman Andrews | Rapidan, VA 22733 | $32,084 |
69 | Daniel Mccall Johnson | Abingdon, VA 24212 | $31,958 |
70 | W H Moss Farm | Burkes Garden, VA 24608 | $31,579 |
71 | Debusk Farm Inc | Glade Spring, VA 24340 | $31,555 |
72 | Guy M Gilbert | Pennington Gap, VA 24277 | $31,381 |
73 | Don-way Farms Inc | Radford, VA 24141 | $31,034 |
74 | Bosselman Farms Inc | Suffolk, VA 23434 | $30,849 |
75 | Elbert L Miller Jr | Staunton, VA 24401 | $30,291 |
76 | Walnut Hill Dairy Inc | Rocky Mount, VA 24151 | $30,252 |
77 | J P Holland Jr | Gladehill, VA 24092 | $30,006 |
78 | John David Barns Jr | Saltville, VA 24370 | $29,402 |
79 | Brandy Rock Farm Inc | Brandy Station, VA 22714 | $28,823 |
80 | Robert C Darby & Sons | Temperanceville, VA 23442 | $28,800 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”