Loan Deficiency in Virginia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 7,570
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Virginia totaled $186,053,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Randy D Christian & Sons | Mechanicsville, VA 23111 | $338,428 |
82 | J & D Carlton Farms Inc | Mattaponi, VA 23110 | $337,783 |
83 | James S Ferguson Jr | Emporia, VA 23847 | $337,635 |
84 | Redd And Redd | Zuni, VA 23898 | $337,295 |
85 | Herbert Wilkerson & Son Inc | Colonial Beach, VA 22443 | $336,550 |
86 | John F Davis | Port Royal, VA 22535 | $334,805 |
87 | Broaddus Farms Inc | Bowling Green, VA 22427 | $332,153 |
88 | Brandon Plantation | Spring Grove, VA 23881 | $330,149 |
89 | Chappell Farms LLC | Dinwiddie, VA 23841 | $329,286 |
90 | Ethel John & George Copland Ptr N | Charles City, VA 23030 | $329,133 |
91 | Michael C Hancock | Sedley, VA 23878 | $326,359 |
92 | Michael J Marks Dba Marks Farms | Capron, VA 23829 | $326,252 |
93 | Robert F Marks III Dba Marks Far | Capron, VA 23829 | $325,358 |
94 | Lewis A Lamb Sons Inc | Rochelle, VA 22738 | $321,339 |
95 | F T W & Sons | Virginia Beach, VA 23457 | $320,875 |
96 | Everett Pickett Upshaw | West Point, VA 23181 | $319,649 |
97 | Thomas R Rountree | Suffolk, VA 23434 | $319,001 |
98 | Jeffrey V Pulley | Ivor, VA 23866 | $317,747 |
99 | William F Deitz III | Heathsville, VA 22473 | $316,302 |
100 | Gary Cross | Zuni, VA 23898 | $315,040 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”