Emergency Conservation Program in Virginia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 4,611
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Virginia totaled $19,452,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Homestead Valley Farm | Bridgewater, VA 22812 | $18,183 |
122 | John A Goodwin | Chilhowie, VA 24319 | $18,146 |
123 | Levander Toulson | Heathsville, VA 22473 | $18,072 |
124 | Joseph D Griffin | Suffolk, VA 23434 | $17,922 |
125 | Kenwood LLC | Orange, VA 22960 | $17,919 |
126 | Elvin Taylor | Stanardsville, VA 22973 | $17,903 |
127 | Lavinia E Deane | Madison, VA 22727 | $17,843 |
128 | Sloop Creek Farms Inc | Burgess, VA 22432 | $17,768 |
129 | Kyle G Hughes | Meadowview, VA 24361 | $17,653 |
130 | Samuel Bazzanella | Mineral, VA 23117 | $17,582 |
131 | Melvin & Elwood Hewitt | Lyndhurst, VA 22952 | $17,529 |
132 | William H Shifflett | Hood, VA 22723 | $17,501 |
133 | Wayland H West | Suffolk, VA 23437 | $17,453 |
134 | Ethel John & George Copland Ptr N | Charles City, VA 23030 | $17,419 |
135 | George T Drake & Son Inc | Newsoms, VA 23874 | $17,388 |
136 | Bosselman Farms Inc | Suffolk, VA 23434 | $17,379 |
137 | James Darnell | Orange, VA 22960 | $17,372 |
138 | Daniel Heyl | Graves Mill, VA 22721 | $17,247 |
139 | J Vince Garland | Village, VA 22570 | $17,224 |
140 | Clowdis Brothers LLC | Saxe, VA 23967 | $17,180 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”