Farm Subsidy information
Virginia
Total Subsidies in Virginia, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 78,109
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Virginia totaled $3,059,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | James M Fogg Farms Inc | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $2,706,448 |
42 | Herbert Wilkerson & Son Inc | Colonial Beach, VA 22443 | $2,687,207 |
43 | R Hart Hudson Farms Inc | South Hill, VA 23970 | $2,679,865 |
44 | W T Holland & Sons Inc | New Church, VA 23415 | $2,657,046 |
45 | Everett Farms Inc | Capron, VA 23829 | $2,648,841 |
46 | Jones Farms Inc | Windsor, VA 23487 | $2,620,985 |
47 | Bain Bros | Capron, VA 23829 | $2,597,122 |
48 | Joey Glenwood Doyle | Emporia, VA 23847 | $2,580,968 |
49 | Vanderhyde Dairy Inc | Chatham, VA 24531 | $2,579,883 |
50 | Crocker Brothers Inc | Windsor, VA 23487 | $2,577,250 |
51 | Bosselman Farms Inc | Suffolk, VA 23434 | $2,547,716 |
52 | Battle Park Farm | Rapidan, VA 22733 | $2,495,300 |
53 | Richard F Hall III | Accomac, VA 23301 | $2,492,662 |
54 | Cedear Lane Farms LLC | Windsor, VA 23487 | $2,470,856 |
55 | Redd And Redd | Zuni, VA 23898 | $2,457,044 |
56 | Morris H Glover Sr | Suffolk, VA 23437 | $2,456,546 |
57 | Five Ash Partnership | Wakefield, VA 23888 | $2,454,999 |
58 | Lewis A Lamb Sons Inc | Rochelle, VA 22738 | $2,452,723 |
59 | Dublin Farms | Horntown, VA 23395 | $2,438,064 |
60 | Sunset View Farm Inc | Zuni, VA 23898 | $2,431,364 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”