Direct Payment Program in Virginia, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 19,095
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Virginia totaled $261,931,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Land Of Promise Farms Partnership | Virginia Beach, VA 23457 | $507,641 |
42 | Cedear Lane Farms LLC | Windsor, VA 23487 | $503,905 |
43 | Davis & Sons Inc | Courtland, VA 23837 | $503,056 |
44 | Williams Family Farms | Virginia Beach, VA 23457 | $499,966 |
45 | Redd And Redd | Zuni, VA 23898 | $493,438 |
46 | Phelps & Phelps | Gaston, NC 27832 | $490,372 |
47 | Alex W Bresko Jr | Disputanta, VA 23842 | $487,519 |
48 | Griffin Brothers | Smithfield, VA 23430 | $486,219 |
49 | Glenn Randolph Moore | Skippers, VA 23879 | $474,726 |
50 | Miller Partnership | Gatesville, NC 27938 | $464,254 |
51 | David Rew | Accomac, VA 23301 | $463,064 |
52 | Joey Glenwood Doyle | Emporia, VA 23847 | $461,694 |
53 | Nurney & Sons | Capron, VA 23829 | $458,030 |
54 | W T Holland & Sons Inc | New Church, VA 23415 | $455,386 |
55 | Riverside Farm Inc | Charles City, VA 23030 | $454,450 |
56 | James M Fogg Farms Inc | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $452,941 |
57 | W H Bray & Sons Incorporated | Urbanna, VA 23175 | $452,731 |
58 | J And J Farms | Suffolk, VA 23437 | $452,562 |
59 | J & D Carlton Farms Inc | Mattaponi, VA 23110 | $451,618 |
60 | J Edward Hatfield III | Franklin, VA 23851 | $451,220 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”