Farm Subsidy information
Virginia
Total Subsidies in Virginia, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 7,842
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Virginia totaled $158,362,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $1,559,137 |
2 | Glover Farms Partnership | Suffolk, VA 23437 | $1,290,826 |
3 | Engel Family Farms | Hanover, VA 23069 | $878,697 |
4 | Cloverfield Enterprises | Champlain, VA 22438 | $832,441 |
5 | Lowe Brothers | Ivor, VA 23866 | $734,676 |
6 | Beechland Farms II Partners | Surry, VA 23883 | $657,908 |
7 | Philip Minor Farms II | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $525,924 |
8 | Five Ash Farm, LLC | Wakefield, VA 23888 | $462,722 |
9 | L&g Farms | Emporia, VA 23847 | $457,241 |
10 | Land Of Promise Farms Partnership | Virginia Beach, VA 23457 | $455,548 |
11 | The Bank Of Southside Virginia ** | Wakefield, VA 23888 | $441,843 |
12 | Cohoke Farm LLC | West Point, VA 23181 | $419,332 |
13 | A L Bailey Farms | Waverly, VA 23890 | $412,367 |
14 | Moore Farms Of Skippers Partnership | Skippers, VA 23879 | $407,490 |
15 | Rosemont Farms LLC | Courtland, VA 23837 | $386,386 |
16 | Jeffrey Allan Seward | Elberon, VA 23846 | $381,204 |
17 | Philip Edwards Farms | Smithfield, VA 23430 | $378,127 |
18 | Brankley Farms Inc | Skipwith, VA 23968 | $376,158 |
19 | Chappell Farms LLC | Dinwiddie, VA 23841 | $364,650 |
20 | William B Bain | Dinwiddie, VA 23841 | $361,220 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>