Total Conservation Programs in Amelia County, Virginia, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 47
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Amelia County, Virginia totaled $23,756 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Whitaker Farms Inc | Amelia Court House, VA 23002 | $463 |
22 | Vaughan Cattle Company LLC | Amelia Court House, VA 23002 | $404 |
23 | James T Shores II | Ford, VA 23850 | $382 |
24 | Little H Bar J | North Chesterfield, VA 23236 | $374 |
25 | Jack E Bulls | Amelia Court House, VA 23002 | $358 |
26 | Mary W Scott | Farmville, VA 23901 | $354 |
27 | Cherry Lane Farm | Amelia Court House, VA 23002 | $342 |
28 | , | $325 | |
29 | Fox Den Farms LLC | Amelia Court House, VA 23002 | $310 |
30 | Reamford Farms LLC | Amelia Court House, VA 23002 | $290 |
31 | Stephen J Byrd | Amelia Court House, VA 23002 | $219 |
32 | Brenda C Palmer | North Chesterfield, VA 23236 | $218 |
33 | Epps Epps & Jackson Inc | Chesterfield, VA 23832 | $212 |
34 | Manda H Gravley | Amelia Court House, VA 23002 | $202 |
35 | Hard Acres Farm LLC | Jetersville, VA 23083 | $192 |
36 | Preston Randolph Willson | Lynchburg, VA 24503 | $180 |
37 | Dwayne D Moore | Amelia Court House, VA 23002 | $163 |
38 | Joyce Davis Pembelton | Chesterfield, VA 23832 | $153 |
39 | David Eugene Smith | Amelia Court House, VA 23002 | $147 |
40 | Windy Springs Farm LLC | Amelia Court House, VA 23002 | $142 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”