Direct Payment Program in Charles City County, Virginia, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 43
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Charles City County, Virginia totaled $3,412,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | George M Copland | Charles City, VA 23030 | $18,905 |
22 | John A Copland Jr | Charles City, VA 23030 | $15,330 |
23 | Justin R Tench | Charles City, VA 23030 | $13,819 |
24 | Arthur R Duke | Charles City, VA 23030 | $12,024 |
25 | Meadowspring Farm | Charles City, VA 23030 | $9,856 |
26 | William J Hopke | Charles City, VA 23030 | $7,757 |
27 | E P Binns III | Providence Forge, VA 23140 | $5,685 |
28 | Robert H Tench II | Charles City, VA 23030 | $5,238 |
29 | Lindy Edward Bosher Sr | Mechanicsville, VA 23111 | $4,730 |
30 | John W Black | Charles City, VA 23030 | $3,881 |
31 | Mark W Black T/a Nances Shop Farm | Charles City, VA 23030 | $2,652 |
32 | Lewis Sisters Farms LLC | Richmond, VA 23221 | $2,307 |
33 | Lorna Flacke | Charles City, VA 23030 | $2,177 |
34 | James H Bailey | Providence Forge, VA 23140 | $2,122 |
35 | Aaron Leonard Black | Charles City, VA 23030 | $1,908 |
36 | Dhc Properties LLC | Providence Forge, VA 23140 | $1,654 |
37 | Berkeley Plantation Lp Llp | Charles City, VA 23030 | $1,399 |
38 | Wellford P Dowdy | Richmond, VA 23231 | $1,380 |
39 | Jeffrey Oakley | Prince George, VA 23875 | $1,189 |
40 | Dr William E Nordt | Charles City, VA 23030 | $1,145 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”