Production Flexibility Program in Charlotte County, Virginia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 497
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Charlotte County, Virginia totaled $1,167,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | M B Pillow | Phenix, VA 23959 | $4,789 |
62 | Harold M Harris | Charlotte Court Hous, VA 23923 | $4,695 |
63 | Delmas Lyle Sowell | Randolph, VA 23962 | $4,648 |
64 | John W Caknipe Jr | Chase City, VA 23924 | $4,563 |
65 | R Glenn Weston Estate | Red Oak, VA 23964 | $4,469 |
66 | S B Nelson | Charlotte Court Hous, VA 23923 | $4,414 |
67 | Mary B Englehart | Charlotte Court Hous, VA 23923 | $4,378 |
68 | Glover D Gilliam | Concord, VA 24538 | $4,226 |
69 | James N Wallace | Drakes Branch, VA 23937 | $4,225 |
70 | W V Nichols Jr | Randolph, VA 23962 | $4,219 |
71 | Robert G Seamster | Phenix, VA 23959 | $4,179 |
72 | John Timothy Ferrell | Wylliesburg, VA 23976 | $4,050 |
73 | James Scott Pugh | Charlotte Court Hous, VA 23923 | $3,939 |
74 | J Renneth Marston | Red House, VA 23963 | $3,931 |
75 | G Wayne Crump | Red Oak, VA 23964 | $3,886 |
76 | Daniel W Cheatham Jr | Brookneal, VA 24528 | $3,760 |
77 | George Morton | Phenix, VA 23959 | $3,756 |
78 | Douglas V Hunsucker | Charlotte Court Hous, VA 23923 | $3,685 |
79 | Garland Puryear Est | Fort Collins, CO 80526 | $3,677 |
80 | Kirk H St John Jr | Charlotte C H, VA 23923 | $3,675 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”