Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Charlotte County, Virginia, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 60
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Charlotte County, Virginia totaled $22,350 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Michael Price | Brookneal, VA 24528 | $422 |
22 | James S Pugh II | Charlotte Court Hous, VA 23923 | $421 |
23 | James Scott Pugh | Charlotte Court Hous, VA 23923 | $421 |
24 | Charles E Overstreet Jr | Phenix, VA 23959 | $414 |
25 | Preston T Hamlet Jr | Phenix, VA 23959 | $412 |
26 | Daniel W Cheatham Jr | Brookneal, VA 24528 | $396 |
27 | Willard K Scruggs | Cullen, VA 23934 | $360 |
28 | Adam M Palmer | Red Oak, VA 23964 | $332 |
29 | Bernard Lynn Royster | Keysville, VA 23947 | $286 |
30 | John W Osborne | Wylliesburg, VA 23976 | $253 |
31 | Grind 'n Stone Farms LLC | Phenix, VA 23959 | $234 |
32 | Knoll Crest Farm Inc | Red House, VA 23963 | $225 |
33 | Louise P Adams | Pamplin, VA 23958 | $220 |
34 | Donnie Wayne Rutledge | Red Oak, VA 23964 | $220 |
35 | Jack W Reynolds | Charlotte Court Hous, VA 23923 | $177 |
36 | Robert M Kolich Jr | Appomattox, VA 24522 | $176 |
37 | Sharon K Whitlow | Virgilina, VA 24598 | $168 |
38 | John T Hunter Jr | Appomattox, VA 24522 | $160 |
39 | Morris Wayne Overstreet Jr | Phenix, VA 23959 | $142 |
40 | Danny Lacks | South Hill, VA 23970 | $139 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”