Farm Subsidy information
Essex County, Virginia
Total Subsidies in Essex County, Virginia, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 75
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Essex County, Virginia totaled $3,343,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | James M Fogg Farms Inc | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $5,614 |
42 | Robinson's D & B Logging LLC | Tappahannock, VA 22560 | $5,573 |
43 | Daniel A Dewey | Caret, VA 22436 | $5,359 |
44 | S S Taliaferro Jr | Dunnsville, VA 22454 | $4,257 |
45 | James Temple Brizendine Jr | Millers Tavern, VA 23115 | $3,960 |
46 | William Peyton Davis | Tappahannock, VA 22560 | $3,569 |
47 | Robert Linwood Mundy | St Stephens Church, VA 23148 | $3,056 |
48 | Ronnie Russell | Water View, VA 23180 | $2,887 |
49 | Robert P Longest | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $2,583 |
50 | Margaret Hundley Davis | Center Cross, VA 22437 | $2,547 |
51 | Ruther E Allen Sr | Catlett, VA 20119 | $2,030 |
52 | Robert Temple Grant | Tappahannock, VA 22560 | $1,667 |
53 | Edna D Davis | Caret, VA 22436 | $1,361 |
54 | Carroll Brown Jr | Tappahannock, VA 22560 | $1,359 |
55 | Stanley T Coghill | Tappahannock, VA 22560 | $1,196 |
56 | Cloverfield Farms Inc | Champlain, VA 22438 | $974 |
57 | Andrew B Taliaferro Jr | Linthicum, MD 21090 | $847 |
58 | Anna Paige Dickinson | Loretto, VA 22509 | $765 |
59 | George Forrest Dickinson Jr | Fredericksburg, VA 22401 | $765 |
60 | Hrf, Inc | Walkerton, VA 23177 | $734 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”