Total Commodity Programs in Gloucester County, Virginia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 130
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Gloucester County, Virginia totaled $10,732,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Donald R Eacho II | Gloucester, VA 23061 | $13,412 |
62 | The P J Casanave Land Clearing Co | Shacklefords, VA 23156 | $12,710 |
63 | Colonial Farm Credit Aca ** | Courtland, VA 23837 | $12,489 |
64 | Piedmont Farms Inc | Mascot, VA 23108 | $12,408 |
65 | Ellsworth B German | North, VA 23128 | $11,979 |
66 | Cecil M Booker Family Limited Par | Gloucester, VA 23061 | $11,966 |
67 | Pointer Bros Inc. | Gloucester, VA 23061 | $10,514 |
68 | Pheasant Acres Farm | Gloucester, VA 23061 | $10,415 |
69 | N T Jones Sr | Gloucester, VA 23061 | $8,529 |
70 | John Ward Jr | Gloucester, VA 23061 | $8,396 |
71 | Lewis Brothers Farm LLC | Dutton, VA 23050 | $8,229 |
72 | Elliott F Hogge | Hayes, VA 23072 | $8,164 |
73 | Under The Stars Farm LLC | Gloucester, VA 23061 | $8,032 |
74 | Gloria A Lilly Revocable Trust | Gloucester, VA 23061 | $7,672 |
75 | Jacquelynn W Wiatt | Ark, VA 23003 | $7,313 |
76 | Albert T Leggett Jr | Wicomico, VA 23184 | $6,962 |
77 | Joseph Franklin Fary | Gloucester, VA 23061 | $6,551 |
78 | Herbert Fitzgerald | Richmond, VA 23226 | $5,912 |
79 | Richard J Leigh | Gloucester, VA 23061 | $5,876 |
80 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $5,646 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”