Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Halifax County, Virginia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 250
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Halifax County, Virginia totaled $967,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Elizabeth P Barksdale | South Boston, VA 24592 | $3,260 |
102 | C J Bales Jr | South Boston, VA 24592 | $3,247 |
103 | Clayton Fallen | Nathalie, VA 24577 | $3,101 |
104 | Ralph Dale Tuck | Virgilina, VA 24598 | $3,100 |
105 | Willard Cardwell | South Boston, VA 24592 | $3,080 |
106 | Gregory K Wade | Nathalie, VA 24577 | $3,071 |
107 | Ronnie Ratliff | Halifax, VA 24558 | $3,045 |
108 | John Michael Tune | Vernon Hill, VA 24597 | $3,019 |
109 | Michael T Perkins | Nathalie, VA 24577 | $2,992 |
110 | D Scott Crowder | Halifax, VA 24558 | $2,963 |
111 | Victor L Lacks | Randolph, VA 23962 | $2,944 |
112 | James S Carrington | South Boston, VA 24592 | $2,864 |
113 | Thomas C Hudson | Alton, VA 24520 | $2,841 |
114 | Andrew Parag III | Nathalie, VA 24577 | $2,840 |
115 | Lewis M Easley | South Boston, VA 24592 | $2,699 |
116 | Willie N Conner | Halifax, VA 24558 | $2,698 |
117 | Edwin Atkinson Chaney III | South Boston, VA 24592 | $2,691 |
118 | James T Midkiff | Halifax, VA 24558 | $2,669 |
119 | Ashby Whorley | South Boston, VA 24592 | $2,638 |
120 | Gail Gupton Owen | Buffalo Junction, VA 24529 | $2,602 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”