Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Hanover County, Virginia, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 57
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Hanover County, Virginia totaled $349,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Lloyd Family Farms | Rockville, VA 23146 | $6,672 |
22 | Hanovertown Farm LLC | Mechanicsville, VA 23116 | $6,180 |
23 | Soggy Bottom Farm Of Va LLC | Glen Allen, VA 23059 | $5,721 |
24 | Eastview Farms Inc | Beaverdam, VA 23015 | $5,692 |
25 | Mark David Mitchell | Mechanicsville, VA 23111 | $5,668 |
26 | Kenneth Ray Kirby | Mechanicsville, VA 23111 | $4,630 |
27 | H Hoge Smith | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $4,543 |
28 | Benjamin Warren Waitman | Mechanicsville, VA 23111 | $3,996 |
29 | James W Crowder | Mechanicsville, VA 23111 | $3,732 |
30 | Sgw LLC | Mechanicsville, VA 23111 | $3,489 |
31 | James W Clay | Montpelier, VA 23192 | $3,382 |
32 | William Ashby Puryear | Doswell, VA 23047 | $3,357 |
33 | Edmund S Simpson III | King William, VA 23086 | $3,238 |
34 | Wirt W Cross | Hanover, VA 23069 | $3,114 |
35 | Edwin C Schwartz | Glen Allen, VA 23059 | $2,704 |
36 | George H Alvis Jr & Sons | Manakin Sabot, VA 23103 | $2,664 |
37 | C C Noland Jr | Beaverdam, VA 23015 | $2,472 |
38 | Samuel H Moody | Beaverdam, VA 23015 | $2,375 |
39 | Timothy Anderson Brannan | Studley, VA 23162 | $1,745 |
40 | Joshua W Mallory | Bumpass, VA 23024 | $1,673 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”