Loan Deficiency in Hanover County, Virginia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 109
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Hanover County, Virginia totaled $4,923,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | W Wickham Smith Jr | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $42,824 |
22 | Cary W Hall | Mechanicsville, VA 23111 | $40,225 |
23 | Peace Agribusines Inc | Glen Allen, VA 23060 | $38,903 |
24 | Bruce Cauthorn | Ashland, VA 23005 | $38,563 |
25 | Willie R Gilman | Glen Allen, VA 23059 | $37,918 |
26 | Randy Bruce | Ashland, VA 23005 | $34,726 |
27 | E C C Woods Jr | Hanover, VA 23069 | $34,261 |
28 | James W Crowder | Mechanicsville, VA 23111 | $32,939 |
29 | Edmund S Simpson III | King William, VA 23086 | $32,048 |
30 | R Garnett Smith Jr | Beaverdam, VA 23015 | $29,074 |
31 | Thomas B Kirby | Mechanicsville, VA 23116 | $27,410 |
32 | R Randolph & Sons LLC | Mechanicsville, VA 23111 | $27,087 |
33 | Cherry Dale Farm, Inc. | Doswell, VA 23047 | $25,796 |
34 | F Richard Barnette | Mechanicsville, VA 23111 | $25,601 |
35 | William Ashby Puryear | Doswell, VA 23047 | $24,209 |
36 | Winfrey Harris | Beaverdam, VA 23015 | $23,120 |
37 | Malcolm V Staton | Ashland, VA 23005 | $22,786 |
38 | Garland Smith | Studley, VA 23162 | $21,485 |
39 | Leroy A Rice | Mechanicsville, VA 23116 | $19,906 |
40 | H Hoge Smith | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $19,374 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”