Total Conservation Programs in Hanover County, Virginia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 98
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Hanover County, Virginia totaled $732,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Janeway Hanover LLC | Doswell, VA 23047 | $1,820 |
42 | Thelma Jones Family Trust | Colonial Heights, VA 23834 | $1,800 |
43 | Doris Carlton | Ashland, VA 23005 | $1,750 |
44 | C W Smith And Sons Inc | Beaverdam, VA 23015 | $1,749 |
45 | Thomas E Leadbetter | Montpelier, VA 23192 | $1,680 |
46 | C C Noland Jr | Beaverdam, VA 23015 | $1,586 |
47 | Donna G Dennehy | Ashland, VA 23005 | $1,544 |
48 | P D Farm LLC | Richmond, VA 23218 | $1,368 |
49 | Joseph D Isbell Jr | Rockville, VA 23146 | $1,332 |
50 | Westwood Grain Farm Inc | Mechanicsville, VA 23111 | $1,329 |
51 | Hugh Hawthorne | Rockville, VA 23146 | $1,235 |
52 | E C C Woods Jr | Hanover, VA 23069 | $1,210 |
53 | Shannon W Pritchard | Mechanicsville, VA 23111 | $1,175 |
54 | David G Stanley | Montpelier, VA 23192 | $1,102 |
55 | Walter Marks | Beaverdam, VA 23015 | $1,083 |
56 | Franklin Stanley | Ashland, VA 23005 | $990 |
57 | Charles Vitale | Studley, VA 23162 | $976 |
58 | W T Gatewood Jr | King And Queen Court, VA 23085 | $945 |
59 | Chastain Incorporated | Manakin Sabot, VA 23103 | $906 |
60 | Terry Moore | Glen Allen, VA 23059 | $843 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”