Total Commodity Programs in Hanover County, Virginia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 257
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Hanover County, Virginia totaled $29,836,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Stephen G Winters | Mechanicsville, VA 23111 | $31,158 |
82 | Westwood Grain Farm Inc | Mechanicsville, VA 23111 | $30,423 |
83 | Joshua W Mallory | Bumpass, VA 23024 | $30,047 |
84 | Jeff Sears | Ashland, VA 23005 | $28,571 |
85 | Ashland Berry Farm Inc | Beaverdam, VA 23015 | $26,159 |
86 | Glenn Martin | Glen Allen, VA 23059 | $24,426 |
87 | Falling Creek Log & Lumber Co | Ashland, VA 23005 | $23,600 |
88 | S L Bosher Jr | Mechanicsville, VA 23111 | $22,112 |
89 | Joseph D Isbell Jr | Rockville, VA 23146 | $21,806 |
90 | Donald S Terrell | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $21,027 |
91 | John T Peace | Glen Allen, VA 23060 | $20,279 |
92 | Benjamin Warren Waitman | Mechanicsville, VA 23111 | $19,988 |
93 | Ingleside Farms Inc. | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $19,868 |
94 | Keith P Waldrop | Montpelier, VA 23192 | $19,024 |
95 | W Pettus Gilman | Glen Allen, VA 23059 | $18,971 |
96 | James Beverly Cocke | Montpelier, VA 23192 | $18,641 |
97 | Edward Glen Talley | Mechanicsville, VA 23116 | $17,654 |
98 | Charles N Kirby | Mechanicsville, VA 23116 | $16,653 |
99 | Ralph R. Randolph | New Kent, VA 23124 | $15,316 |
100 | Patricia K Kirby | Mechanicsville, VA 23116 | $14,591 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”