Crop Disaster Assistance Program in King and Queen County, Virginia, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 70

Recipients of Crop Disaster Assistance Program from farms in King and Queen County, Virginia totaled $1,893,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Crop Disaster Assistance Program
1995-2023
1Philip Minor FarmsSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$236,589
2James M Fogg Farms IncSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$184,433
3C. Wayne And Kenneth A Otto, DunkSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$141,903
4Richard M Schools JrSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$123,884
5J & D Carlton Farms IncMattaponi, VA 23110$113,011
6Thomas O Longest JrKing Queen Ch, VA 23085$98,227
7Beaver Dam FarmLittle Plymouth, VA 23091$86,255
8Tazewell FarmNewtown, VA 23126$74,210
9Kevin M SchoolsSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$60,441
10John R CarltonMattaponi, VA 23110$57,093
11William Davis CarltonLittle Plymouth, VA 23091$53,497
12Hillsborough Farm IncWalkerton, VA 23177$42,954
13Robert P LongestSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$40,960
14David Brian CarltonShacklefords, VA 23156$34,747
15Agri-landCenter Cross, VA 22437$34,233
16Henry Logan Smith JrBruington, VA 23023$32,899
17William Todd Henley IIIWalkerton, VA 23177$27,699
18Eugene C LongestSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$23,597
19Oliver Wendell Draine IIIWalkerton, VA 23177$23,591
20Walton BrothersMechanicsville, VA 23111$23,506

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag