Total Disaster Programs in King and Queen County, Virginia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 97
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in King and Queen County, Virginia totaled $3,948,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Philip Minor Farms | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $403,849 |
2 | James M Fogg Farms Inc | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $384,947 |
3 | Plainview Farm Inc | Shacklefords, VA 23156 | $240,324 |
4 | C. Wayne And Kenneth A Otto, Dunk | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $208,315 |
5 | J & D Carlton Farms Inc | Mattaponi, VA 23110 | $195,604 |
6 | Philip Minor Farms II | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $192,793 |
7 | Beaver Dam Farm Inc | Little Plymouth, VA 23091 | $178,085 |
8 | Richard M Schools Jr | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $176,841 |
9 | Thomas O Longest Jr | King Queen Ch, VA 23085 | $152,247 |
10 | Kevin M Schools | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $132,243 |
11 | John R Carlton | Mattaponi, VA 23110 | $104,044 |
12 | Robert P Longest | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $97,036 |
13 | Beaver Dam Farm | Little Plymouth, VA 23091 | $86,255 |
14 | William Davis Carlton | Little Plymouth, VA 23091 | $82,889 |
15 | Hillsborough Farm Inc | Walkerton, VA 23177 | $81,545 |
16 | Tazewell Farm | Newtown, VA 23126 | $74,210 |
17 | Hrf, Inc | Walkerton, VA 23177 | $53,736 |
18 | James M. Gibson Trucking LLC | Kingqueen Court Hous, VA 23085 | $52,875 |
19 | Mike Gibson & Sons Logging Inc | Kingqueen Court Hous, VA 23085 | $52,875 |
20 | Tyler Seal Logging | Newtown, VA 23126 | $52,875 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>