Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in King George County, Virginia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 21
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in King George County, Virginia totaled $17,349 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | David Newhall III | King George, VA 22485 | $5,404 |
2 | Rodney D Rollins | Colonial Beach, VA 22443 | $1,961 |
3 | Herbert L Williams | King George, VA 22485 | $1,016 |
4 | W Hazel Lumpkin | King George, VA 22485 | $960 |
5 | June H Blakley | King George, VA 22485 | $859 |
6 | Leola Dennison | King George, VA 22485 | $823 |
7 | Janet Gayle Harris | King George, VA 22485 | $733 |
8 | Walter Deceased Jones | King George, VA 22485 | $729 |
9 | Wilson W Clare | King George, VA 22485 | $724 |
10 | Lucille Rollins | King George, VA 22485 | $600 |
11 | J Cleveland Frank Jr | Jersey, VA 22481 | $576 |
12 | Hobert M Southall | King George, VA 22485 | $556 |
13 | Marmion Farm | King George, VA 22485 | $485 |
14 | James B Bolton | King George, VA 22485 | $420 |
15 | J R Fogg | Oak Grove, VA 22443 | $420 |
16 | Sutton & Henderson | Fredericksburg, VA 22405 | $419 |
17 | W A Ventures | Prairie, MS 39756 | $329 |
18 | Robert L Britt | King George, VA 22485 | $304 |
19 | Thomas Kramer | King George, VA 22485 | $288 |
20 | Myrtle Dudley | King George, VA 22485 | $243 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>