Farm Subsidy information
King George County, Virginia
Total Subsidies in King George County, Virginia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 285
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in King George County, Virginia totaled $16,983,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | W F Bevan | King George, VA 22485 | $4,545 |
162 | Caleb Steinc | Port Royal, VA 22535 | $4,512 |
163 | Marjorie R. Rollins | King George, VA 22485 | $4,458 |
164 | Sylvia Rollins | King George, VA 22485 | $4,236 |
165 | E L Frank III | King George, VA 22485 | $4,235 |
166 | Milton E Gallahan Jr | King George, VA 22485 | $4,233 |
167 | John H King Jr | King George, VA 22485 | $4,049 |
168 | Wanda Catlett | Montross, VA 22520 | $3,994 |
169 | Charles C Ward Sr | King George, VA 22485 | $3,990 |
170 | T R Blakely | King George, VA 22485 | $3,827 |
171 | James W Norris | King George, VA 22485 | $3,756 |
172 | William Daniel Allensworth | Colonial Beach, VA 22443 | $3,712 |
173 | Horace V Ashton | King George, VA 22485 | $3,700 |
174 | Joseph B Powell | King George, VA 22485 | $3,674 |
175 | Julian Madison | King George, VA 22485 | $3,652 |
176 | Monrovia Farm LLC | Colonial Beach, VA 22443 | $3,595 |
177 | Curtis Marshall | King George, VA 22485 | $3,591 |
178 | Lorraine Allen | Silver Spring, MD 20904 | $3,571 |
179 | Oak Crest Vineyard & Winery, Inc. | King George, VA 22485 | $3,552 |
180 | Johan Lagerkvist | King George, VA 22485 | $3,485 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”