Farm Subsidy information
King George County, Virginia
Total Subsidies in King George County, Virginia, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 30
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in King George County, Virginia totaled $580,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Herbert Wilkerson & Son Inc | Colonial Beach, VA 22443 | $157,748 |
2 | Tate And Tate Inc | Colonial Beach, VA 22443 | $46,265 |
3 | Wmm Farms Inc | King George, VA 22485 | $18,965 |
4 | Janet Gayle Harris | King George, VA 22485 | $7,243 |
5 | Mount View Family Limited Partnership Llp | King George, VA 22485 | $4,285 |
6 | , | $3,580 | |
7 | Larry S Weedon | King George, VA 22485 | $3,031 |
8 | Elaine Grigsby-arnade | Oakton, VA 22124 | $2,998 |
9 | Wendell Laposata | King George, VA 22485 | $2,041 |
10 | John G King | King George, VA 22485 | $1,721 |
11 | Anna Clarke Sas | Virginia Beach, VA 23452 | $1,588 |
12 | Phillip Joseph Rollins | King George, VA 22485 | $1,297 |
13 | William H Edwards Jr | King George, VA 22485 | $1,079 |
14 | James W Norris | King George, VA 22485 | $939 |
15 | Agnes M Williams | King George, VA 22485 | $845 |
16 | Nancy Roan Grapes | King George, VA 22485 | $784 |
17 | Elena Ellis | Dogue, VA 22451 | $762 |
18 | David Schneider | King George, VA 22485 | $669 |
19 | Dudley Farm LLC | King George, VA 22485 | $618 |
20 | Ashton Family Partnership | King George, VA 22485 | $608 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>