Total Commodity Programs in King George County, Virginia, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 178
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in King George County, Virginia totaled $8,418,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | James Pitts | King George, VA 22485 | $68,359 |
22 | Frank Moore | King George, VA 22485 | $56,695 |
23 | Robert Arthur Owens | Fredericksburg, VA 22408 | $55,271 |
24 | Robert Chambers | Mine Run, VA 22508 | $54,230 |
25 | R G Strother | King George, VA 22485 | $53,061 |
26 | Charles L Henderson | Fredericksburg, VA 22405 | $50,568 |
27 | Herbert L Williams | King George, VA 22485 | $48,551 |
28 | Lawrence Deceased Carr | King George, VA 22485 | $46,497 |
29 | Robert M Tremblay | King George, VA 22485 | $45,169 |
30 | C Latane Bowie | Colonial Beach, VA 22443 | $45,140 |
31 | Aesland Farms | Prairie, MS 39756 | $44,160 |
32 | J C Owens Jr | King George, VA 22485 | $42,056 |
33 | Sutton & Henderson | Fredericksburg, VA 22405 | $42,033 |
34 | Johan Lagerkvist | King George, VA 22485 | $39,407 |
35 | Lewis Alexander Ashton III | King George, VA 22485 | $39,325 |
36 | Charles L Henderson Farms LLC | Fredericksburg, VA 22405 | $36,705 |
37 | Stanley Rollins | King George, VA 22485 | $36,671 |
38 | Brian Williams | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $36,426 |
39 | Agnes M Williams | King George, VA 22485 | $35,015 |
40 | Amy N Thomas | Woodbridge, VA 22192 | $31,143 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”