Farm Subsidy information
King William County, Virginia
Total Subsidies in King William County, Virginia, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 56
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in King William County, Virginia totaled $2,094,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Edge Farm Lc | Aylett, VA 23009 | $10,241 |
22 | Richard E Vaughan Jr | Hanover, VA 23069 | $9,120 |
23 | C C And W R Davis Jr | West Point, VA 23181 | $9,088 |
24 | Randy D Christian & Sons | Mechanicsville, VA 23111 | $8,558 |
25 | Burnway Farm | Aylett, VA 23009 | $6,596 |
26 | Bent Creek Farms, Inc. | Aylett, VA 23009 | $5,761 |
27 | William C Pearson | Manquin, VA 23106 | $5,402 |
28 | John T Davis | Tappahannock, VA 22560 | $4,682 |
29 | J M Newcomb & Sons | Hanover, VA 23069 | $4,648 |
30 | Sloe Grove Farm | Aylett, VA 23009 | $4,627 |
31 | Clements Farms Inc | Manquin, VA 23106 | $3,771 |
32 | Edgewood Angus LLC | West Point, VA 23181 | $3,556 |
33 | Philip Minor Farms II | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $3,311 |
34 | Kevin Harrell | West Point, VA 23181 | $3,018 |
35 | Evelynton Farms Inc | Charles City, VA 23030 | $2,985 |
36 | Thomas H Farmer | Hanover, VA 23069 | $2,813 |
37 | Thomas Eubank Jr | Aylett, VA 23009 | $2,662 |
38 | Erwin S Campbell | Manquin, VA 23106 | $2,637 |
39 | John N Mills & Sons | Hanover, VA 23069 | $2,438 |
40 | Bees Knees Farm, LLC | West Point, VA 23181 | $2,142 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”