Farm Subsidy information
Middlesex County, Virginia
Total Subsidies in Middlesex County, Virginia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 143
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Middlesex County, Virginia totaled $19,575,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | James Michael Reed Jr | Urbanna, VA 23175 | $37,245 |
42 | James T Crittenden | Deltaville, VA 23043 | $32,064 |
43 | T H Crittenden & Son Inc | Hardyville, VA 23070 | $31,797 |
44 | Valley Farm C/o Eva Jo Kelly | Aylett, VA 23009 | $28,383 |
45 | Eric A Johnson | Urbanna, VA 23175 | $27,684 |
46 | Beaver Dam Farm Inc | Little Plymouth, VA 23091 | $24,755 |
47 | Macey Willis White Jr Irrevocable | Hartfield, VA 23071 | $24,676 |
48 | Daniel Lockley III | Saluda, VA 23149 | $24,476 |
49 | Christine Bristow | Topping, VA 23169 | $22,901 |
50 | W R Harrell | Urbanna, VA 23175 | $19,801 |
51 | Thomas B Gilbert | Hardyville, VA 23070 | $18,914 |
52 | Edwin W Ruark | Deltaville, VA 23043 | $18,309 |
53 | Tazwell Jacob Kirby | Urbanna, VA 23175 | $17,575 |
54 | Douglas Banfield | Wake, VA 23176 | $17,075 |
55 | Moores Dairy Farm Inc | Saluda, VA 23149 | $16,201 |
56 | James T Crittenden And Son | Deltaville, VA 23043 | $15,903 |
57 | G H Northam Jr | Church View, VA 23032 | $15,763 |
58 | Rachel Edwards | Saluda, VA 23149 | $15,590 |
59 | Ronnie Russell | Water View, VA 23180 | $14,361 |
60 | Henry Baxter Sr | Saluda, VA 23149 | $14,029 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”