Production Flexibility Program in Middlesex County, Virginia, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 51
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Middlesex County, Virginia totaled $1,131,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | T H Crittenden & Son Inc | Hardyville, VA 23070 | $13,098 |
22 | Macey Willis White Jr | Hartfield, VA 23071 | $12,770 |
23 | G H Northam Jr | Church View, VA 23032 | $12,537 |
24 | James T Crittenden And Son | Deltaville, VA 23043 | $12,461 |
25 | W Ellis Walton | Church View, VA 23032 | $12,352 |
26 | Valley Farm C/o Eva Jo Kelly | Aylett, VA 23009 | $11,660 |
27 | Howell L Revere | Hartfield, VA 23071 | $10,264 |
28 | William D Carlton | Shacklefords, VA 23156 | $8,926 |
29 | Christine Bristow | Topping, VA 23169 | $8,592 |
30 | Gordon Robins | Urbanna, VA 23175 | $7,366 |
31 | Moores Dairy Farm Inc | Saluda, VA 23149 | $7,013 |
32 | J R Segar Jr | Midlothian, VA 23113 | $7,011 |
33 | James Lewis Reed | Church View, VA 23032 | $5,717 |
34 | T Booker Moore | Church View, VA 23032 | $4,907 |
35 | Herbert M Lockley Sr | Locust Hill, VA 23092 | $3,893 |
36 | Eric A Johnson | Urbanna, VA 23175 | $3,888 |
37 | Beaver Dam Farm | Little Plymouth, VA 23091 | $3,740 |
38 | Mary Ruth Selby | Hardyville, VA 23070 | $3,681 |
39 | Henry Baxter Sr | Saluda, VA 23149 | $3,671 |
40 | M. Hollis Tanksley | Hartfield, VA 23071 | $2,874 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”