Farm Subsidy information
New Kent County, Virginia
Total Subsidies in New Kent County, Virginia, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 125
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in New Kent County, Virginia totaled $14,675,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | John L Throckmorton | Mechanicsville, VA 23111 | $16,114 |
42 | Johnston Partners LLC | New Kent, VA 23124 | $14,138 |
43 | C N Crump | Lanexa, VA 23089 | $12,631 |
44 | Clinton B Allen | Barhamsville, VA 23011 | $10,180 |
45 | Barney R Groves | Howardsville, VA 24562 | $9,741 |
46 | Taylor Family's Eltham Farm Joint | West Point, VA 23181 | $9,134 |
47 | William H Douglas | New Kent, VA 23124 | $8,906 |
48 | Patrick Clarke | Mechanicsville, VA 23111 | $8,454 |
49 | Janice M Fisher | New Kent, VA 23124 | $7,960 |
50 | Old Tavern Farm LLC | Quinton, VA 23141 | $7,958 |
51 | Holly Fork Produce And More, LLC | Barhamsville, VA 23011 | $7,626 |
52 | N.s. Farms LLC | Charles City, VA 23030 | $7,525 |
53 | Randolph Howard Black | Richmond, VA 23231 | $7,222 |
54 | E M Ware | Hallieford, VA 23068 | $6,281 |
55 | Ethel John & George Copland Ptr N | Charles City, VA 23030 | $5,382 |
56 | Pete Adamson | Providence Forge, VA 23140 | $5,368 |
57 | Peace Farms | Quinton, VA 23141 | $5,060 |
58 | Beverly Heath Sr | Barhamsville, VA 23011 | $4,998 |
59 | Clinton A Allen | Barhamsville, VA 23011 | $4,995 |
60 | Mary H Allen | Barhamsville, VA 23011 | $4,591 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”