Total Commodity Programs in Northampton County, Virginia, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 303
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Northampton County, Virginia totaled $31,020,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dalbys Farms Inc | Capeville, VA 23313 | $476,850 |
22 | Yaros Farms Inc | Cape Charles, VA 23310 | $472,980 |
23 | Ray Newman | Virginia Beach, VA 23455 | $447,012 |
24 | William E Shockley Jr | Cheriton, VA 23316 | $377,276 |
25 | Wayne T Heath Farms Inc | Townsend, VA 23443 | $361,438 |
26 | Ballard Fish & Oyster Co LLC | Cape Charles, VA 23310 | $345,000 |
27 | W Rawlings Scott Jr | Cape Charles, VA 23310 | $344,759 |
28 | H R Parks Farms Inc | Cape Charles, VA 23310 | $335,312 |
29 | William S Floyd | Machipongo, VA 23405 | $333,243 |
30 | G Fred Floyd Jr | Machipongo, VA 23405 | $290,438 |
31 | T Blair Stewart | Exmore, VA 23350 | $266,371 |
32 | Seabay Farms LLC | Belle Haven, VA 23306 | $264,572 |
33 | Charles West | Birdsnest, VA 23307 | $260,506 |
34 | James Kellam | Franktown, VA 23354 | $251,197 |
35 | Thomas Harper Shockley | Cheriton, VA 23316 | $244,193 |
36 | Nottingham Clams Inc | Cheriton, VA 23316 | $243,922 |
37 | Hoge A Floyd III | Belle Haven, VA 23306 | $241,248 |
38 | E A Underhill | Machipongo, VA 23405 | $230,799 |
39 | Charles Ames Sr T/a Ames Farms | Exmore, VA 23350 | $228,386 |
40 | Robert Scott Jr | Cheriton, VA 23316 | $208,755 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”