CCC Organic Programs in Rockingham County, Virginia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 25
Recipients of CCC Organic Programs from farms in Rockingham County, Virginia totaled $163,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | CCC Organic Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Shenandoah Valley Organic, LLC | Harrisonburg, VA 22802 | $82,545 |
2 | Shenandoah Growers Inc. | Harrisonburg, VA 22802 | $43,496 |
3 | Grazeland Dairy Inc | Dayton, VA 22821 | $7,876 |
4 | Herbco International | Duvall, WA 98019 | $5,376 |
5 | Radical Roots Inc | Keezletown, VA 22832 | $3,000 |
6 | Hobbit Hill Farm LLC | Mt Crawford, VA 22841 | $2,932 |
7 | Interchange Group, Inc. | Harrisonburg, VA 22801 | $2,500 |
8 | Timothy Conrad Showalter Ehst | Rockingham, VA 22802 | $1,500 |
9 | Kenneth Beery Knicely | Dayton, VA 22821 | $1,391 |
10 | Luebben Farms LLC | Bridgewater, VA 22812 | $1,296 |
11 | Second Mountain Farm LLC | Rockingham, VA 22802 | $1,180 |
12 | Roundhouse Companies Inc. | Duvall, WA 98019 | $1,106 |
13 | Virgil T Wenger | Harrisonburg, VA 22801 | $1,018 |
14 | Vpgc, LLC | Hinton, VA 22831 | $1,000 |
15 | Virgil T Wenger T/a Cedar Springs Farm | Harrisonburg, VA 22801 | $988 |
16 | Dorothy C Miller | Bridgewater, VA 22812 | $966 |
17 | Radical Roots Inc Dba Radical Roo | Keezletown, VA 22832 | $751 |
18 | John D Geil Jr | Broadway, VA 22815 | $750 |
19 | Gerald W Knicely | Dayton, VA 22821 | $676 |
20 | Kenneth Beery Knicely T/a Hilltop | Dayton, VA 22821 | $675 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>