Total Disaster Programs in Scott County, Virginia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,126
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Scott County, Virginia totaled $5,941,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Audrey Diane Williams | Gate City, VA 24251 | $23,090 |
62 | W Carlyle Byington | Nickelsville, VA 24271 | $21,827 |
63 | David James Dean | Gate City, VA 24251 | $20,961 |
64 | Midway Timber Inc | Fort Blackmore, VA 24250 | $20,712 |
65 | Carolyn Christine Berry | Blackwater, VA 24221 | $20,607 |
66 | Jason Michael Cleek | Gate City, VA 24251 | $20,394 |
67 | Burin Brodis Lane Jr | Fort Blackmore, VA 24250 | $20,038 |
68 | William Thomas Byington | Nickelsville, VA 24271 | $19,894 |
69 | Claude A Williams | Kingsport, TN 37660 | $19,622 |
70 | John Hugh Meade | Nickelsville, VA 24271 | $18,494 |
71 | Charlie Winebarger | Castlewood, VA 24224 | $18,151 |
72 | W H Nuckels | Nickelsville, VA 24271 | $18,014 |
73 | Timothy Lee Hall | Gate City, VA 24251 | $17,944 |
74 | Ronnie Bevins | Nickelsville, VA 24271 | $17,718 |
75 | John J Ferguson | Nickelsville, VA 24271 | $17,490 |
76 | Steve Ray Carter | Fort Blackmore, VA 24250 | $17,489 |
77 | Toby Hilton | Duffield, VA 24244 | $17,237 |
78 | Donald T Osborne Jr | Lebanon, VA 24266 | $17,108 |
79 | Scott Stallard | Nickelsville, VA 24271 | $16,712 |
80 | Tommy J Smith | Nickelsville, VA 24271 | $16,688 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”