Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Shenandoah County, Virginia, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 180
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Shenandoah County, Virginia totaled $470,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Galestone Farm LLC | Mount Jackson, VA 22842 | $4,615 |
22 | High Hope Dairy Inc | Edinburg, VA 22824 | $4,436 |
23 | Franwood Farms Inc | New Market, VA 22844 | $4,094 |
24 | James M Mohr | New Market, VA 22844 | $3,981 |
25 | Triple B Herefords LLC | Fort Valley, VA 22652 | $3,847 |
26 | James A Rhodes | Maurertown, VA 22644 | $3,845 |
27 | W Todd Hensley | Mount Jackson, VA 22842 | $3,644 |
28 | Roger L Cook | Woodstock, VA 22664 | $3,634 |
29 | Scott Douglas Stickley | Strasburg, VA 22657 | $3,430 |
30 | Gary A Lantz | Mount Jackson, VA 22842 | $3,332 |
31 | Mfh Rolling Acres Farm LLC | Mount Jackson, VA 22842 | $3,238 |
32 | Gary L Vance | Strasburg, VA 22657 | $3,188 |
33 | Dennis D Baker | Mount Jackson, VA 22842 | $3,163 |
34 | Frank Hoover Jr | Edinburg, VA 22824 | $3,128 |
35 | Shane Allen Steed | Maurertown, VA 22644 | $3,118 |
36 | Wilson Dysart | Edinburg, VA 22824 | $3,017 |
37 | Matthew Lee Polk | Edinburg, VA 22824 | $3,010 |
38 | Gary D Ramsey | Fort Valley, VA 22652 | $2,774 |
39 | Tusing Brothers Ptr | Mount Jackson, VA 22842 | $2,691 |
40 | Daniel L Rosenberger | Toms Brook, VA 22660 | $2,646 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”