Direct Payment Program in Shenandoah County, Virginia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 183
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Shenandoah County, Virginia totaled $1,878,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Charles R Garber | Timberville, VA 22853 | $4,062 |
82 | Noah A Dellinger | Edinburg, VA 22824 | $4,021 |
83 | Thomas A Gibson Sr | Edinburg, VA 22824 | $3,954 |
84 | Frederickson-whitehurst Farms Inc | Mount Jackson, VA 22842 | $3,931 |
85 | Bob S Neff | Quicksburg, VA 22847 | $3,769 |
86 | Pollyanna Halterman | Quicksburg, VA 22847 | $3,769 |
87 | Wind Song Farm | Strasburg, VA 22657 | $3,665 |
88 | Edward A Garber | New Market, VA 22844 | $3,394 |
89 | Ronald F Wakeman | Edinburg, VA 22824 | $3,371 |
90 | John L Laughlin | Edinburg, VA 22824 | $3,290 |
91 | Mfh Rolling Acres Farm LLC | Mount Jackson, VA 22842 | $3,269 |
92 | Elwood M Showman | Mount Jackson, VA 22842 | $3,264 |
93 | Ralph D Stickley | Strasburg, VA 22657 | $3,212 |
94 | David S Wilkins | Toms Brook, VA 22660 | $3,202 |
95 | Wilson G Eastep | Woodstock, VA 22664 | $3,197 |
96 | Grayson S Getz | Quicksburg, VA 22847 | $3,091 |
97 | Alan S Dodson | Mount Jackson, VA 22842 | $3,086 |
98 | Harry M Morris | Toms Brook, VA 22660 | $3,069 |
99 | Cecil W Miller | Mount Jackson, VA 22842 | $3,021 |
100 | Glenn E Keller | Toms Brook, VA 22660 | $2,919 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”