Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Shenandoah County, Virginia, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 20
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Shenandoah County, Virginia totaled $68,274 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Patricia L Brumback | New Market, VA 22844 | $15,461 |
2 | Susan D Shiley | Woodstock, VA 22664 | $13,765 |
3 | Guy Milton Gochenour | Woodstock, VA 22664 | $11,878 |
4 | Kathy Lynn Kagey | Orkney Springs, VA 22845 | $9,621 |
5 | Patrick Harold Bradley Jr Freedom Farms LLC | Edinburg, VA 22824 | $3,550 |
6 | Lisa R Zirkle | Quicksburg, VA 22847 | $2,968 |
7 | Hideaway Farms LLC | Edinburg, VA 22824 | $2,919 |
8 | Brown Cow, LLC | Fort Defiance, VA 24437 | $1,759 |
9 | Tammie R Stiles | Woodstock, VA 22664 | $1,457 |
10 | Sycamore Banks Farm LLC | Mount Jackson, VA 22842 | $1,033 |
11 | Anna J Morris | Toms Brook, VA 22660 | $1,032 |
12 | Kathie W Dellinger | Mount Jackson, VA 22842 | $988 |
13 | Lorrie D Crabill | Toms Brook, VA 22660 | $335 |
14 | Karla Funkhouser | Strasburg, VA 22657 | $322 |
15 | Jaclyn Danielle Cleaver | Mount Jackson, VA 22842 | $297 |
16 | T Gale Baker | Mount Jackson, VA 22842 | $255 |
17 | Marca C Shirkey | New Market, VA 22844 | $231 |
18 | Hailey D Shoemaker | Edinburg, VA 22824 | $182 |
19 | Mechanical Animals LLC | Mount Jackson, VA 22842 | $132 |
20 | Dana N Gochenour | Woodstock, VA 22664 | $89 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>