Farm Subsidy information
Shenandoah County, Virginia
Total Subsidies in Shenandoah County, Virginia, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 111
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Shenandoah County, Virginia totaled $1,738,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mfh Rolling Acres Farm LLC | Mount Jackson, VA 22842 | $17,116 |
22 | William C Hockman | Lebanon Church, VA 22641 | $14,486 |
23 | Charles R Garber | Timberville, VA 22853 | $12,876 |
24 | Day Enterprises Lp | Quicksburg, VA 22847 | $12,487 |
25 | Donnie Earl Estep | New Market, VA 22844 | $10,902 |
26 | Larry G Barrick | Edinburg, VA 22824 | $10,489 |
27 | Shane F Richman | Edinburg, VA 22824 | $9,963 |
28 | Golden Eagle Farm | Woodstock, VA 22664 | $9,885 |
29 | Janet Eastep George | Edinburg, VA 22824 | $9,729 |
30 | Floyd Edward Baker | Mount Jackson, VA 22842 | $9,537 |
31 | Wilkins Brothers Dairy LLC | New Market, VA 22844 | $9,518 |
32 | James Cory Wetzel | Edinburg, VA 22824 | $9,395 |
33 | William C Wetzel | Woodstock, VA 22664 | $9,395 |
34 | High Hope Dairy Inc | Edinburg, VA 22824 | $9,359 |
35 | Steven Allen Baker | Mount Jackson, VA 22842 | $9,011 |
36 | Lee Charles Ryan | Mount Jackson, VA 22842 | $8,879 |
37 | Nelson O Sine | Woodstock, VA 22664 | $8,863 |
38 | Brett Barrick Wightman | Mount Jackson, VA 22842 | $8,208 |
39 | Ronald F Wakeman | Edinburg, VA 22824 | $8,194 |
40 | George Wade Hawkins III | Woodstock, VA 22664 | $8,166 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”