Farm Subsidy information
Chesapeake City, Virginia
Total Subsidies in Chesapeake City, Virginia, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 119
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chesapeake City, Virginia totaled $1,149,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Michael James Rama | Chesapeake, VA 23321 | $2,979 |
42 | L Wade Fulford | Stokes, NC 27884 | $2,917 |
43 | Eugene T White III | Chesapeake, VA 23322 | $2,862 |
44 | Powel Farm Holdings LLC | Bloomington, IL 61702 | $2,800 |
45 | Rif Iv LLC | Bloomington, IL 61702 | $2,800 |
46 | Herbert Wenger | Chesapeake, VA 23322 | $2,774 |
47 | F H Hildebrand | Chesapeake, VA 23322 | $2,764 |
48 | Annette D Peoples | Chesapeake, VA 23322 | $2,379 |
49 | Clyde E Cassell | Chesapeake, VA 23323 | $2,311 |
50 | Christopher Weatherly | Virginia Beach, VA 23456 | $2,261 |
51 | Michael Fisher | Chesapeake, VA 23322 | $2,205 |
52 | Hunter's Edge | Chesapeake, VA 23322 | $2,144 |
53 | Ryan Christopher Dudley | Virginia Beach, VA 23457 | $2,034 |
54 | J C Todd Jr | Chesapeake, VA 23322 | $1,962 |
55 | Michael Zydron | Chesapeake, VA 23321 | $1,920 |
56 | Russell Heath | Chesapeake, VA 23322 | $1,902 |
57 | John H Pierce | Chesapeake, VA 23322 | $1,861 |
58 | Amos Woodrow Lane Marital Trust | Chesapeake, VA 23322 | $1,810 |
59 | Lela Chasten | Chesapeake, VA 23322 | $1,607 |
60 | William H Cartwright | Chesapeake, VA 23322 | $1,550 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”