Deficiency Payment in Virginia Beach City, Virginia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 52
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Virginia Beach City, Virginia totaled $188,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | C I Meiggs Jr | Virginia Beach, VA 23456 | $1,751 |
22 | Claude P Brown | Virginia Beach, VA 23450 | $1,680 |
23 | Marvin C Etheridge II | Virginia Beach, VA 23457 | $1,587 |
24 | Gary E Freeman | Virginia Beach, VA 23457 | $1,379 |
25 | Nelson Morris | Virginia Beach, VA 23457 | $1,318 |
26 | Dennis Hoggard | Virginia Beach, VA 23457 | $1,226 |
27 | David Flanagan | Virginia Beach, VA 23456 | $1,141 |
28 | Rufus C White Sr | Virginia Beach, VA 23457 | $1,063 |
29 | D B Munden | Virginia Beach, VA 23457 | $942 |
30 | J Stuart Ives Jr | Virginia Beach, VA 23454 | $807 |
31 | Virginia Meiggs | Virginia Beach, VA 23457 | $661 |
32 | George A Waller | Virginia Beach, VA 12345 | $619 |
33 | Kenneth R Twiford | Virginia Beach, VA 23457 | $552 |
34 | James E Etheridge | Virginia Beach, VA 23457 | $438 |
35 | Roy W Wood | Clarksville, VA 23927 | $425 |
36 | Clara Belle Shirley | Virginia Beach, VA 23457 | $336 |
37 | Baker Miller | Fort Mill, SC 29715 | $293 |
38 | H M Dudley | Virginia Beach, VA 23457 | $291 |
39 | James W Bright | Virginia Beach, VA 23457 | $268 |
40 | Erma J Saunders | Virginia Beach, VA 23457 | $28 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”