Total Commodity Programs in Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 42,899
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Washington totaled $3,639,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Glade Creek Ranch | Prosser, WA 99350 | $3,429,708 |
22 | O'neal Farms Joint Venture | Connell, WA 99326 | $3,402,835 |
23 | Brown & Ford Ranch | Prescott, WA 99348 | $3,391,022 |
24 | Double D Farms | Dayton, WA 99328 | $3,376,678 |
25 | Stahl Hutterian Brethren | Ritzville, WA 99169 | $3,268,315 |
26 | Tompkins Brothers | Prescott, WA 99348 | $3,201,872 |
27 | C & C Farms | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $3,198,324 |
28 | Lm Farms Jv | Saint John, WA 99171 | $3,120,089 |
29 | Adams Farm Partnership | Coulee City, WA 99115 | $3,117,294 |
30 | Archer Farms | Dayton, WA 99328 | $3,103,341 |
31 | Emtman Bros Farms Jv | Valleyford, WA 99036 | $2,912,033 |
32 | Spokane Hutterian Brethren Inc | Reardan, WA 99029 | $2,888,811 |
33 | Marlin Hutterian Brethren | Marlin, WA 98832 | $2,887,473 |
34 | Dreger Enterprises Jv | Creston, WA 99117 | $2,862,942 |
35 | East Downing Farms Jv | Saint John, WA 99171 | $2,861,006 |
36 | Moore Farms | Prosser, WA 99350 | $2,858,992 |
37 | Mcgregor Land & Livestock Co | Hooper, WA 99333 | $2,827,852 |
38 | Poe Farms Jv | Hartline, WA 99135 | $2,814,637 |
39 | Mead Ranch | Dayton, WA 99328 | $2,814,432 |
40 | S & S Farms Gp | Thornton, WA 99176 | $2,809,882 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”