Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Washington, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 918
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Washington totaled $11,630,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Jeffrey Douglas Dawson | Colville, WA 99114 | $45,807 |
42 | Dick Ledgerwood & Son Inc | Clarkston, WA 99403 | $45,803 |
43 | 4 Livestock LLC | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $45,506 |
44 | Seney Land & Livestock Joint Venture | Dayton, WA 99328 | $44,630 |
45 | Elmer C Anderson Inc | Prosser, WA 99350 | $44,408 |
46 | Haeberle Ranch Inc | Okanogan, WA 98840 | $43,209 |
47 | Davenport Cattle Company LLC | Goldendale, WA 98620 | $43,184 |
48 | Craig Vejraska Family Limited Partnership | Omak, WA 98841 | $42,645 |
49 | Brown Cattle Company LLC | Lamont, WA 99017 | $39,791 |
50 | Klaveano Ranches Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $38,891 |
51 | Saddle Mtn Ranch Inc | Othello, WA 99344 | $37,586 |
52 | Blain Ranch Inc | Roosevelt, WA 99356 | $37,555 |
53 | James C Linn | Yakima, WA 98903 | $37,546 |
54 | Cody W Schoesler | Ritzville, WA 99169 | $37,474 |
55 | Sam Heitstuman | Clarkston, WA 99403 | $36,639 |
56 | , | $35,648 | |
57 | R & J Land & Livestock Inc | Saint John, WA 99171 | $35,227 |
58 | , | $35,109 | |
59 | Egbert Cattle Co LLC | Grand Coulee, WA 99133 | $34,861 |
60 | Troy Acord | Twisp, WA 98856 | $34,687 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”