Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Washington, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 8,007
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Washington totaled $65,041,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | The Sheffels Company Gp | Wilbur, WA 99185 | $114,012 |
42 | Horrigan Farms Inc | Pasco, WA 99301 | $113,967 |
43 | Boulder Creek Inc | Spangle, WA 99031 | $110,807 |
44 | Fulfs Bros Farms Gp | Pullman, WA 99163 | $110,174 |
45 | Erwin Farms Jv | Prescott, WA 99348 | $109,681 |
46 | Glade Creek Ranch | Prosser, WA 99350 | $109,542 |
47 | Neilsen Farms Joint Venture | Almira, WA 99103 | $108,188 |
48 | Double D Farms | Dayton, WA 99328 | $106,459 |
49 | Adams Farm Partnership | Coulee City, WA 99115 | $104,583 |
50 | Double P Ranch Jv | Mansfield, WA 98830 | $104,556 |
51 | Washington Trust Bank ** | Pullman, WA 99163 | $104,466 |
52 | C & C Farms | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $103,033 |
53 | Mcgregor Land & Livestock Co | Hooper, WA 99333 | $102,349 |
54 | East Downing Farms Jv | Saint John, WA 99171 | $101,164 |
55 | D & M Farms Gp | Rosalia, WA 99170 | $101,124 |
56 | H-4 Farms Partnership | Kahlotus, WA 99335 | $100,532 |
57 | Reh Co | Connell, WA 99326 | $99,617 |
58 | Matt Miller Inc | Lind, WA 99341 | $99,476 |
59 | Huntley Family Joint Venture | Diamond, WA 99111 | $97,860 |
60 | Archer Farms | Dayton, WA 99328 | $96,954 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”