Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 9,945
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Washington totaled $239,193,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Tom Downs Farms Inc | Quincy, WA 98848 | $294,424 |
82 | David L Stevens | Wilson Creek, WA 98860 | $293,578 |
83 | Mcmurray & Son Inc | Pullman, WA 99163 | $290,903 |
84 | Kamerrer Family Farm LLC | Pullman, WA 99163 | $288,747 |
85 | Stevens Hay Farm Inc | Soap Lake, WA 98851 | $286,612 |
86 | D & M Farms Gp | Rosalia, WA 99170 | $285,549 |
87 | Archer Farms | Dayton, WA 99328 | $282,075 |
88 | L 2 Inc | Quincy, WA 98848 | $280,675 |
89 | Beechinor Farms Joint Venture | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $280,160 |
90 | Schoonover Hutterian Brethren | Odessa, WA 99159 | $278,805 |
91 | Lm Farms Jv | Saint John, WA 99171 | $275,858 |
92 | Rose Stevens | Wilson Creek, WA 98860 | $273,065 |
93 | Doubletree Ranches Inc | Bickleton, WA 99322 | $269,786 |
94 | B R Bair Farms Inc | Stratford, WA 98853 | $267,389 |
95 | Zimmerman Ranch Jv | Almira, WA 99103 | $264,527 |
96 | Gunning Farms Inc | Phoenix, AZ 85015 | $263,659 |
97 | Randall E Kulm Farm | Lind, WA 99341 | $263,644 |
98 | Mead Ranch | Dayton, WA 99328 | $262,653 |
99 | Rifle Ridge Joint Venture | Prescott, WA 99348 | $262,215 |
100 | Barker Enterprises Joint Venture | Dayton, WA 99328 | $258,733 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”