Conservation Reserve Program in Washington, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 5,566
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Washington totaled $57,724,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | C & R Ranch Limited Partnership | Eltopia, WA 99330 | $50,000 |
102 | Ernest & Eleanor Wagner Family Lp | Medical Lake, WA 99022 | $50,000 |
103 | Rehn Grain Inc | Odessa, WA 99159 | $50,000 |
104 | Donald A Dryer Sr Wa Trust | Drewsey, OR 97904 | $50,000 |
105 | The Rehn Family LLC | Odessa, WA 99159 | $50,000 |
106 | Hodgen Family Trust | Spokane, WA 99203 | $50,000 |
107 | John R Realph | Crawford, CO 81415 | $50,000 |
108 | Marilyn Van Hollebeke | Pasco, WA 99301 | $50,000 |
109 | Vicki J Schwab | Ephrata, WA 98823 | $50,000 |
110 | Mr Stock & Stubble Inc | Asotin, WA 99402 | $50,000 |
111 | Nordby Land LLC | Mansfield, WA 98830 | $50,000 |
112 | Van De Graaf Ranch Properties LLC | Sunnyside, WA 98944 | $50,000 |
113 | A To Z Farm Limited Liability Company | Spokane, WA 99223 | $50,000 |
114 | Kbwn LLC | Moses Lake, WA 98837 | $50,000 |
115 | Eureka Flats LLC | Prescott, WA 99348 | $50,000 |
116 | Buckley Daughters Farms, LLC | Touchet, WA 99360 | $50,000 |
117 | William T Donegan | Marysville, WA 98270 | $50,000 |
118 | Bg's Land LLC | Cheney, WA 99004 | $50,000 |
119 | Matt Miller Inc | Lind, WA 99341 | $50,000 |
120 | Ridge Farms LLC | Mabton, WA 98935 | $50,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”