Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Washington, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 9,934
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Washington totaled $307,403,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61 | Randy James And Terri James Dba James Farms | Dayton, WA 99328 | $365,874 |
| 62 | Grant & Nancy Miller | Lind, WA 99341 | $363,221 |
| 63 | White Rock Farms Inc | Lamont, WA 99017 | $362,576 |
| 64 | Rifle Ridge Joint Venture | Prescott, WA 99348 | $361,897 |
| 65 | Nelson Farms Inc | Farmington, WA 99128 | $355,441 |
| 66 | Bafus Family Jv | Diamond, WA 99111 | $355,325 |
| 67 | A E Knott Farms Inc | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $354,256 |
| 68 | Clarence Allen Hood | Pullman, WA 99163 | $350,562 |
| 69 | Pearce Brothers Jv | Wilson Creek, WA 98860 | $348,238 |
| 70 | Poe Farms Jv | Hartline, WA 99135 | $347,061 |
| 71 | Whitman College | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $343,558 |
| 72 | S & S Farms Gp | Thornton, WA 99176 | $342,951 |
| 73 | W F Gould Ranches Inc | Prosser, WA 99350 | $341,647 |
| 74 | Philip M Sealock | Toppenish, WA 98948 | $336,459 |
| 75 | Wiley Ranches Inc | Prosser, WA 99350 | $336,099 |
| 76 | Sid Mayberry Inc | Almira, WA 99103 | $336,033 |
| 77 | Mercer Dryland Farms | Prosser, WA 99350 | $331,231 |
| 78 | Seney Land & Livestock Joint Venture | Dayton, WA 99328 | $330,659 |
| 79 | Kinch Farms Inc | Washtucna, WA 99371 | $330,087 |
| 80 | Cochran Partnership | Pullman, WA 99163 | $329,457 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf