Total Commodity Programs in Washington, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 42,614
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Washington totaled $3,592,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 81 | Wm & Jayne Deife Jv | Marlin, WA 98832 | $2,012,975 |
| 82 | Warden Hutterian Brethren | Warden, WA 98857 | $2,011,787 |
| 83 | Corbett Draw Farms Gp | Wilbur, WA 99185 | $1,995,858 |
| 84 | Tanke Joint Venture | Mohler, WA 99154 | $1,995,819 |
| 85 | Voise Farms Joint Venture | Odessa, WA 99159 | $1,994,013 |
| 86 | Howard P Smith Ranch | Waitsburg, WA 99361 | $1,984,939 |
| 87 | Meadowview Jv | Davenport, WA 99122 | $1,980,638 |
| 88 | The Berg Partnership | Paterson, WA 99345 | $1,970,621 |
| 89 | Nelson Farms Inc | Farmington, WA 99128 | $1,964,402 |
| 90 | Kf Farms Joint Venture | Colfax, WA 99111 | $1,963,431 |
| 91 | Fleener Enterprises | Pullman, WA 99163 | $1,956,092 |
| 92 | R B K Joint Venture | Creston, WA 99117 | $1,926,031 |
| 93 | Walkers Joint Venture | Hartline, WA 99135 | $1,921,125 |
| 94 | Kontos Co | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $1,915,953 |
| 95 | Bafus Bros Gp | Rosalia, WA 99170 | $1,907,822 |
| 96 | Brent Roylance & Sons Gp | Moses Lake, WA 98837 | $1,907,593 |
| 97 | Cochran Partnership | Pullman, WA 99163 | $1,906,249 |
| 98 | Blachly & Sons | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $1,900,917 |
| 99 | Bromiley Brothers Ranch | East Wenatchee, WA 98802 | $1,896,092 |
| 100 | Mickelsen Dairy Inc | Moses Lake, WA 98837 | $1,895,942 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf