Farm Subsidy information
Asotin County, Washington
Total Subsidies in Asotin County, Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 593
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Asotin County, Washington totaled $96,151,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Linda Wolf | Clarkston, WA 99403 | $1,010,895 |
22 | Yochum Farm & Rentals | Seattle, WA 98126 | $1,005,717 |
23 | Hostetler Jv | Asotin, WA 99402 | $1,002,620 |
24 | Mary Reeves | Asotin, WA 99402 | $1,000,363 |
25 | Blankinship Ranches Inc | Lewiston, ID 83501 | $1,000,078 |
26 | J Bar S Inc | Asotin, WA 99402 | $948,953 |
27 | Heitstuman Brothers | Asotin, WA 99402 | $905,211 |
28 | Reeves Ranch | Asotin, WA 99402 | $887,052 |
29 | Lma Farms Inc | Asotin, WA 99402 | $886,573 |
30 | David Heitstuman | Anatone, WA 99401 | $834,370 |
31 | Sam Heitstuman | Clarkston, WA 99403 | $828,348 |
32 | Bryan Edward Bishop | Clarkston, WA 99403 | $784,096 |
33 | Seibly Farms Inc | Anatone, WA 99401 | $688,758 |
34 | Wayne Heitstuman | Anatone, WA 99401 | $623,292 |
35 | Jeff Appleford | Asotin, WA 99402 | $599,889 |
36 | Jeanne Coe | Spokane, WA 99201 | $593,358 |
37 | Brad D Forgey | Anatone, WA 99401 | $592,371 |
38 | Janine Weiss | Asotin, WA 99402 | $582,035 |
39 | Shirley Smick Ttee Of Smick Trust | Saint John, WA 99171 | $580,852 |
40 | Kenneth H Weiss | Asotin, WA 99402 | $574,190 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”