Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Asotin County, Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 51
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Asotin County, Washington totaled $2,159,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dustin Browne | Asotin, WA 99402 | $30,638 |
22 | David Heitstuman | Anatone, WA 99401 | $28,936 |
23 | Florence Hansen Trust | Colfax, WA 99111 | $27,840 |
24 | Jack D Bolick Trust | Clarkston, WA 99403 | $25,927 |
25 | Kenneth & Janine Weiss LLC | Asotin, WA 99402 | $25,360 |
26 | Lynn Ausman | Clarkston, WA 99403 | $23,791 |
27 | Peola Farms Inc | Juliaetta, ID 83535 | $22,593 |
28 | Mary E Browne Family Trust | Clarkston, WA 99403 | $18,969 |
29 | Douglas Browne | Clarkston, WA 99403 | $16,037 |
30 | Mary Ausman | Clarkston, WA 99403 | $12,636 |
31 | Pamela R Ausman Trust | Vancouver, WA 98682 | $11,349 |
32 | Rocky Ridge Land And Cattle | Anatone, WA 99401 | $7,424 |
33 | Byron R Hostetler Trust | Asotin, WA 99402 | $7,046 |
34 | Brit M Ausman | Asotin, WA 99402 | $6,375 |
35 | Jack D Bolick Marital Trust | Clarkston, WA 99403 | $6,358 |
36 | Ilene Adams | Olympia, WA 98503 | $5,658 |
37 | King-fitzgerald LLC | Clarkston, WA 99403 | $5,648 |
38 | Peter B Greene | Lewiston, ID 83501 | $5,207 |
39 | Maxine Bishop | Colfax, WA 99111 | $5,055 |
40 | Linda Swearingen | Lewiston, ID 83501 | $3,682 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”